即刻觀影
劇情賞析
編輯推薦
大濛
方郁婷,柯煒林,湯毓綺,曾敬驊,陳以文,蔡昌憲,陳竹升,詹馥瑄,胡智強,陳俊成,劉冠廷,林美秀,謝章穎,林志儒,陳季霞,王傳一,林雨宣,朱德剛,黃丞邦,廖邱堃,百白,許莉廷,江澄瑄,姜予,盧尉寧,紀亮竹,王明臺,李雪,林道禹,王靖惇,李國強,林澤凱,蕭東意,宋蕓樺,潘麗麗,周家寬1954年，一個15歲女孩，聽聞哥哥在臺北被槍斃的消息，獨自搭火車從嘉義到臺北，不顧一切后果，只為帶哥哥回家。 她懵懂無知初到臺北，意外下被來自廣東、思鄉而歸不得的三輪車夫所救。兩個沒有血緣關系的人，因為緣分變成患難之交，展開一段為籌措贖尸費，而賭上性命的旅程。
永恒站
邁爾斯·特勒,伊麗莎白·奧爾森,卡勒姆·特納,約翰·厄爾利,達明·喬伊·倫道夫,貝蒂·巴克利,杰夫·桑卡,潘塔·莫斯勒,布雷迪·德魯利斯,歐嘉·梅雷迪斯,塞巴斯蒂安·比林斯利-羅德里格斯,諾亞·布羅姆利,歐佳·佩斯塔,珍妮·克魯蒂爾,巴里·普賴默斯,埃里克·高,露西·特恩布爾,大衛·Z·科恩,丹尼·麥克,凱爾·沃倫影片構建了一個妙趣橫生的死后世界觀：人離世后將抵達一個連接無數“永恒世界”的中轉站，一旦選擇就無法改變。故事始于賴瑞（邁爾斯·特勒 飾）被蝴蝶餅噎死的荒誕開場，他在中轉站重獲青春，等待妻子瓊安（伊麗莎白·奧爾森 飾）的到來。然而瓊安到來后，卻面臨新的難題——她在戰爭中陣亡的前夫盧克（卡勒姆·特納 飾），竟已在此苦候她67年。 兩個男人為了獲得瓊安的最終選擇， 展開了一系列令人捧腹的“競爭”，各種啼笑皆非的較量讓本該嚴肅的永恒抉擇變成了一場妙趣橫生的“愛情競賽”。面對車站里呈現的琳瑯滿目的人生可能，一邊是共同走過漫長歲月、充滿柴米油鹽記憶的現任丈夫；一邊是曾令她刻骨銘心、苦候她67年的前度摯愛， 瓊安必須做出最終的選擇：與誰攜手， 共赴永恒？
忘我星途
Vino G. Bastian,迪婭·潘德拉,Agus KuncoroA narcissistic performer's world crumbles when he mysteriously loses his talent right before the biggest opportunity of his career.
電子云層下
梅拉布·尼尼澤,丘爾潘·哈馬托娃,拉米爾·薩爾霍烏德諾夫,卡里姆·帕卡什科夫,阿納斯塔西婭·梅利尼科娃,彼得·戈薩沃斯基,路易斯·弗蘭克,維克托·博科夫,維多利亞··科如托科娃霧雪籠罩的怪異河岸。四處散落著鋼精和水泥。一棟廢棄的摩天大樓。平坦處仍未完工的公路橋。一座宏大的金屬制的馬的雕像。還有一座列寧的雕塑，他的右手伸展著指向空曠處。這是一個冰冷、僵化的無人之境，衰落的往昔在這里與想象中的未來接壤。人們漫無目的地穿過這個不真實的世界。原先確定無疑的事情不再令人確信，親戚朋友都消失了，理想已經隨風而散。薩莎從國外返回家鄉，她死去的父親曾經是這片建筑工地的主人，現在她繼承了這筆遺產：一位正在尋找工友的吉爾吉斯斯坦工人；一位前額有塊反著光的紅色皮膚的建筑師；一位曾在莫斯科路障旁與葉利欽比肩站立的導游。他們中的一些人會莫名其妙地流鼻血。一位年輕的學生問道，“我們是誰？我是誰？一切都混亂無章。” 小阿列克謝?日耳曼用七個章節，將他祖國的精神面貌壓縮成一部長敘述的象征性電影，一場流暢精心設計的人與攝影機之舞。
私房錢事件
劉瑋婷,張楚松,李婷婷,王迎奇一對出現感情危機的情侶，奔赴荒山深處的度假屋，展開浪漫之旅。然而各懷心事的兩人彼此設計，意外被卷入一場綁架與追殺。荒山夜逃、冰湖驚魂，在絕境的生死考驗中，他們被迫攜手同行，危機四伏間，愛與信任被重新喚醒，二人終于明白相守的意義。
等待方舟
耶日·斯圖爾,克里斯提娜·楊達,卡里娜·謝魯斯克,馬里烏什·德莫霍夫斯基,馬雷克·瓦爾切夫斯基,揚·諾維茨基,亨里克·比斯塔,萊昂·涅姆奇克,克茲佐夫·馬扎克,斯坦尼斯瓦夫·伊加爾Set in an underground dungeon inhabited by bundled, ragged human beings, after the nuclear holocaust. The story follows the wanderings of a hero through the situations of survival. People wait for the Ark to arrive and rescue them while their habitat falls apart. Delving deep into the dusty and long abandonded vaults of b-cinema in search of lost gems always leaves me with a bittersweet taste. On one hand the discovery of unexpected gems where no one would think them possible is a rewarding experience. On the other hand though it makes one wonder how many of these remarkable low-budget oddities, personal love affairs of directors never quite famous and now all but forgotten, have almost forever slipped from memory? n any case what we have here is a little post-apocalyptic gem from Poland that is really better than it has any right to. The dystopian near future of O-BI, O-BA finds a group of survivors of the nuclear war that ravaged the Earth inhabiting an underworld concrete bunker and biding their time as they wait for the mysterious Ark, an air ship of some kind that will come and save them. The Ark proves to be an elaborate hoax, carefully designed to give hope to the malnourished and desperate denizens of the bunker, while in the meantime the dome that separates their miserable existence from the nuclear winter outside is slowly caving in. What first striked me about the movie is the design of the bunker and the depiction of the survivors. The survivors are gaunt, filthy and terrible-looking penitents, dressed in rags and aimlessly wandering the neon-lit halls of the bunker like automatons. The bunker is a rundown, seedy place, with bright neon lights peering from all sides like the eyes of malignant beasts. On one hand it is a slightly 80's depiction of the dystopian future but the movie never stoops down to MAD MAX cheese. Instead it combines biting political satire with the bleak outlook of a world with no future, black comedy with barbs on apathy, religion and power. The survivors, for example, are fed some kind of flour dropping from a tube that hovers in the air - later on we discover the food supervisor uses books and the Bible itself as filler for this meagre meal. There are many such short symbolic touches, perhaps not life-changing or faith-restoring, yet playful, clever and inspired. One thing is for sure; O-BI, O-BA is not your run-of-the-mill sci-fi schlock. It overcomes its modest budget with creativity and has genuine artistic aspirations both from a writing and directing perspective. My opinion is that it should have been filmed in black and white instead of colour though. The director uses atmospheric light and shadow to great effect and it would have registered even better in stark black and white. The blue-green neon on the other hand outstays its welcome after a while. Just a minor gripe in an otherwise solid b-movie with its heart set in all the right places. Imagine a less bleak THE ROAD (Cormac McCarthy) being injected with the satire and humour of DR.STRANGELOVE and you're getting there. See it if you can find it.