即刻觀影
劇情賞析
編輯推薦
遇事別沖動
鹿超,宋杰,宋媛一塊寶地遭人惦記、一枚軍功章引賊來、十萬現金不翼而飛，夜半老漢離奇昏迷，三名陌生男子橫躺家中。是陰謀？是誤會？層層烏龍背后，深藏的是榮譽執念與親情渴望。當真相揭開，一切竟源于最樸素的執念與最陰差陽錯的誤會……榮譽與親情，最終將如何安放？
東京少女
夏帆,佐野和真,近藤芳正,秋本奈緒美,福永真梨佳《東京少年》的姊妹篇，同樣以“無法有結果的戀情”為主題。 2008年的東京少女未步（夏帆 飾）的夢想是成為一名奇幻小說家，這天和母親以及母親的情人在餐廳用餐，對母親準備再婚一事十分排斥的未步憤而離席。 1912年，宮田時次郎（佐野和真 飾）再次被夏目漱石退稿，缺乏生活經驗的他寫作出來的小說缺乏打動人心的力量。他沮喪地拿著退稿離開出版社。 突然發生地震，站立不穩的未步失手掉了手機，從樓梯墜入連接過去與未來的蟲洞，被時次郎拾得。 不可思議地，相隔幾近一百年的兩個人，由誤會到了解，漸漸情愫暗生，彼此傾訴生活中遭遇的問題，還異時空約會。但是身處未來的未步總是知道歷史的發生，而當她想改變時，卻發現一切只是無能為力。但是即便不能改變命運，也仍有真愛留低。
暗流低語
尼娜·凱莉,亞當·迪馬科,Michèle Duquet,基娜·巴斯蒂達斯,容海峰,Ryan Turner,阿里·米倫,Marisol D'Andrea,Austin Tuason,Seled Calderon,Bianca Nugara,Jayda Woods,Sarah Beaudin,Christina Notto伊薇（尼娜·凱莉 Nina Kiri 飾）肩負著照顧臨終母親的重任，她渴望逃離支離破碎的現實帶來的孤獨感。如今，她住在一間堆滿感傷紀念品和回憶的房子里，理智和生活秩序都維系在她制作的超自然播客節目《底音》上。雖然她通常對搭檔賈斯汀發給她的那些令人毛骨悚然的音頻文件持懷疑態度，但最新收到的音頻卻讓她感到不同尋常。一對年輕備孕夫婦的十段從未公開錄音逐一揭曉，每一段都比上一段更加不祥。隨著伊薇將這些錄音與她目前的遭遇進行對比，隱藏的信息逐漸顯現，將她推向瘋狂的邊緣……
心靈與智慧
德懷特·戴維·艾森豪威爾,William Marshall,喬治·皮杜爾本片是由哥倫比亞電影公司出資委任電視紀錄片導演皮特?戴維斯（Peter Davis）拍攝的一部探討美國為何在1959-1975年期間發動對越戰爭，越南人民的悲慘遭遇，以及美國人民對越戰態度轉變的紀錄片。這是美國本土首次放映直接采訪刻畫越南平民慘境的影片，片中多次表現了美軍將領的種族主義和美國政府對國內人民的無恥欺騙。電影于1974年在法國嘎納電影節首映，隨即便因內容的嚴重爭議性被哥倫比亞公司擱置。制片人波特?施耐德（Bert Schneider）與亨利?蘭格（Henry Lange）向哥倫比亞公司買回了版權，并終于1975年通過華納公司在美國公映。本片獲1974年奧斯卡最佳紀錄片獎，并被提名同年金球獎最佳紀錄片。
戴夫造了個迷宮
尼克·圖恩,梅拉·羅希特·庫姆巴尼,亞當·布斯奇,詹姆斯·烏爾班尼亞克,弗蘭克·凱提,斯科特·納維,斯蒂芬妮·阿琳,克斯汀·范奈絲,斯科特·克林斯基,蒂莫西·諾德溫德,約翰·赫寧甘,瑞克·歐弗頓,卡米拉·艾爾內斯,德魯·尼加,艾蒂安·埃克特,布里特妮·多伊奇,杰西卡·格拉夫斯藝術家戴夫，他的職業生涯，從來沒有完成任何重要的作品。這次他造了一個迷宮，包含了幻想陷阱、誘殺裝置，但不知何時，迷宮有了自己的生命，自行創造出多種機關怪物，甚至牛頭怪。朋友們為了營救戴夫，進入折紙迷宮，大戰機關和怪物，一場撕逼大戰迫在眉睫……
等待方舟
耶日·斯圖爾,克里斯提娜·楊達,卡里娜·謝魯斯克,馬里烏什·德莫霍夫斯基,馬雷克·瓦爾切夫斯基,揚·諾維茨基,亨里克·比斯塔,萊昂·涅姆奇克,克茲佐夫·馬扎克,斯坦尼斯瓦夫·伊加爾Set in an underground dungeon inhabited by bundled, ragged human beings, after the nuclear holocaust. The story follows the wanderings of a hero through the situations of survival. People wait for the Ark to arrive and rescue them while their habitat falls apart. Delving deep into the dusty and long abandonded vaults of b-cinema in search of lost gems always leaves me with a bittersweet taste. On one hand the discovery of unexpected gems where no one would think them possible is a rewarding experience. On the other hand though it makes one wonder how many of these remarkable low-budget oddities, personal love affairs of directors never quite famous and now all but forgotten, have almost forever slipped from memory? n any case what we have here is a little post-apocalyptic gem from Poland that is really better than it has any right to. The dystopian near future of O-BI, O-BA finds a group of survivors of the nuclear war that ravaged the Earth inhabiting an underworld concrete bunker and biding their time as they wait for the mysterious Ark, an air ship of some kind that will come and save them. The Ark proves to be an elaborate hoax, carefully designed to give hope to the malnourished and desperate denizens of the bunker, while in the meantime the dome that separates their miserable existence from the nuclear winter outside is slowly caving in. What first striked me about the movie is the design of the bunker and the depiction of the survivors. The survivors are gaunt, filthy and terrible-looking penitents, dressed in rags and aimlessly wandering the neon-lit halls of the bunker like automatons. The bunker is a rundown, seedy place, with bright neon lights peering from all sides like the eyes of malignant beasts. On one hand it is a slightly 80's depiction of the dystopian future but the movie never stoops down to MAD MAX cheese. Instead it combines biting political satire with the bleak outlook of a world with no future, black comedy with barbs on apathy, religion and power. The survivors, for example, are fed some kind of flour dropping from a tube that hovers in the air - later on we discover the food supervisor uses books and the Bible itself as filler for this meagre meal. There are many such short symbolic touches, perhaps not life-changing or faith-restoring, yet playful, clever and inspired. One thing is for sure; O-BI, O-BA is not your run-of-the-mill sci-fi schlock. It overcomes its modest budget with creativity and has genuine artistic aspirations both from a writing and directing perspective. My opinion is that it should have been filmed in black and white instead of colour though. The director uses atmospheric light and shadow to great effect and it would have registered even better in stark black and white. The blue-green neon on the other hand outstays its welcome after a while. Just a minor gripe in an otherwise solid b-movie with its heart set in all the right places. Imagine a less bleak THE ROAD (Cormac McCarthy) being injected with the satire and humour of DR.STRANGELOVE and you're getting there. See it if you can find it.